A state where the practice is spread across half a dozen cities and the High Court is a journey from most of them. The evening list is a travel decision.
The High Court of Andhra Pradesh sits at Amaravati and came into existence on 1 January 2019 when the former common High Court at Hyderabad was bifurcated. Lawgger carries its cause lists for any date, the live display board through court hours, and CNR case tracking with a plain-words digest of every order.
Andhra Pradesh advocates are the only body of practitioners in India who have had their High Court change city inside a decade. Until the bifurcation of 2019 the state's High Court work went to Hyderabad. Since then it has gone to Amaravati.
The consequence is prosaic and it is the most important fact about practising here. An Andhra Pradesh practice is not concentrated around its High Court the way a Chennai or Kolkata practice is. It is spread across Visakhapatnam, Vijayawada, Guntur, Tirupati, Kurnool and Rajahmundry, and for most advocates the High Court is a journey — for some, a long one.
Which changes what a cause list is for. In a city where the court is twenty minutes away, checking the list the night before is good practice. In a state where it is several hours away, checking the list the night before is the decision itself: whether to travel, whether to send a junior, whether to instruct someone local, whether to stay and finish the district brief instead.
That is the case for having the list on a phone in the evening rather than on a noticeboard in the morning. Not efficiency. Not tidiness. A journey you either make or do not make.
On most court pages this section comes near the end. Here it comes second, because for a large share of AP advocates the district court is the practice and the High Court is the appeal.
Lawgger carries cause lists for around 700 district courts nationally, for any court on any date, covering 722 districts across 35 states and union territories. An advocate at Kurnool watching a matter at Guntur, or an advocate at Visakhapatnam holding a brief at Rajahmundry, gets exactly what a High Court practitioner gets: the list, the next date, and the order.
The mechanics are the same in both tiers. Save a matter by CNR once. Every order that comes on the file arrives as a plain-words digest — interim stay granted; counter due in four weeks — and every listing arrives as an alert with the court number and the item number attached. Nothing to look up, nothing to remember to check.
A district practice generates more of these than a High Court practice does, because the volume is higher and the dates are shorter. Which is precisely why it should not be done from memory. See case status, case tracking and what a CNR number is.
By case number or CNR. Lawgger then looks for it in every list the court publishes — advance, daily and supplementary — instead of leaving you to scroll a long document at nine in the evening.
By party name, by advocate name or by case number. Advocate-wise reading covers a whole chamber in one search, which is how staffing decisions actually get made the night before.
You are told which court, which item and which day, in the evening. If a supplementary item is added later the same night, you are told that too — before you have set out, not after.
See the cause list guide for how advance, daily and supplementary lists differ, and advocate-wise cause lists.
Two numbers matter: the court number and the item number being taken up now. Read against your own item, they tell you how much of the morning you still have.
For an advocate who has travelled to Amaravati for one matter, the board answers a second question as well — whether the day is going to be worth staying for, or whether the item is going to be reached at all. Boards run live through court hours, generally 10:30 to 16:30 IST, across the Supreme Court, all 25 High Courts and the NCLT, NCLAT and CAT.
This website does not show live court data. The boards are in the app. Read the display board guide for the notation — pass over, part heard, not reached.
Yes — and Lawgger carries them. Decisions of the former common High Court at Hyderabad, and of the composite Andhra Pradesh High Court before it, sit inside 2.07 crore Indian judgments in full text, alongside the Supreme Court and all 25 High Courts, with 1.28 crore case-to-section links and 18 lakh citation links joining them.
The right posture towards those authorities is check, don't assume. A case that has been cited in Andhra chambers for thirty years may still be perfectly good law; it may equally have been overruled by a larger bench, doubted, or displaced by statute since. The fact that everyone cites it is not the answer to the question.
So every authority Lawgger surfaces carries a good-law verdict, and every answer is pin-cited to the page it came from — not a paraphrase with a case name attached, but a citation you can open and read in place. Paste a draft brief into Authority Check and you get a Table of Authorities with a verdict against each case in it, before filing.
See legal research and good-law checking. The Telangana High Court page treats the other half of the same problem.
Andhra Pradesh's district practice runs substantially in Telugu, and a great many advocates who argue in English take instructions, write notes and explain outcomes to clients in Telugu. Lawgger works in 10 Indian languages. The current list of supported languages is shown in the app.
Ask in Telugu, read the answer in Telugu, and open the judgment underneath in full text in the language it was delivered in, pin-cited to the page. The pin-cite is what stops a translated answer from becoming a summary you cannot cite. See how the AI works.
Lawgger holds 21 statutory limitation clocks. Give it the dates and it computes the running period and shows what remains — rolling past weekends, gazetted holidays and court vacations, so the date you are given is a working date rather than an arithmetical one. Where a filing will need an application under section 5, the clock raises a condonation flag instead of staying silent.
That matters more in a dispersed practice, where a certified copy may be collected in one city, the brief settled in another and the filing done in a third. The clock does not care where anyone is; it cares about the dates, and it wants them recorded rather than remembered.
It is a computation on the dates you supply. It is not advice and it does not replace your own reading of the Limitation Act. Try the limitation calculator and see practice management for turning those dates into tasks with owners.
The High Court of Andhra Pradesh sits at Amaravati. Before the bifurcation of 2019 the state's litigants and advocates went to the common High Court at Hyderabad, so AP advocates are the only body of practitioners in India whose High Court has changed city within the last decade.
On 1 January 2019, when the former common High Court at Hyderabad was bifurcated into a High Court for Telangana and a High Court for Andhra Pradesh. Matters pending on that date carried on, which is why an AP practice still works constantly with the record of the predecessor court.
Yes. Lawgger carries cause lists for around 700 district courts nationally, for any court on any date, across 722 districts in 35 states and union territories. AP district matters are tracked by CNR on the same terms as High Court matters, with a plain-words digest of every order.
Yes. The list for a hearing day is published on the evening before, with supplementary items sometimes following later the same night. Lawgger shows the list as soon as the court publishes it and alerts you if a matter on your watchlist appears, with the court number and item number.
Yes, in the app. Boards run live through court hours, roughly 10:30 to 16:30 IST, and show the item number being taken up in each court. Lawgger carries live boards for the Supreme Court, all 25 High Courts and the NCLT, NCLAT and CAT. This website does not show live court data.
Yes. Decisions of the former common High Court at Hyderabad and of the composite Andhra Pradesh High Court are inside Lawgger's 2.07 crore full-text coverage. Each carries a good-law verdict, so you can check where an authority now stands instead of assuming it survived the split unchanged.
Yes. Lawgger works in 10 Indian languages including Telugu. You can put a research question in Telugu and read the answer in Telugu, with the judgment behind it still available in full text and pin-cited to the page it came from.
Yes. Every plan starts with a 14-day free trial of the full product and no card is required to begin. After the trial Lawgger is Rs 1,999 a month or Rs 19,999 a year, about Rs 66 a day, with GST invoices and cancellation at any time. See pricing.
Lawgger is software for advocates. It is not a law firm and gives no legal advice. Court information is shown as published in official court records.
Fourteen days free, no card. Rs 1,999 a month or Rs 19,999 a year after that, with GST invoices and cancellation whenever you like.