Quote-only pricing is normal in Indian legal publishing and there is nothing improper about it. It exists because a law school, a twenty-partner firm and a sole practitioner genuinely are different customers. But it has a cost that falls on the smallest buyers hardest.
A chamber planning next year's overheads can price its rent, its clerk, its stationery and its court fees. It cannot price its research subscription without starting a conversation, and the number that comes back depends on who asks, how they ask, and what was agreed last year. Two advocates of similar standing, in similar practices, can pay materially different amounts for the same product and neither will ever know. At renewal, the figure moves again — and by then the practice is built around the platform, which is not a strong position from which to negotiate.
Our position is simply the other one. One price, on the pricing page, the same for everybody: ₹1,999 a month or ₹19,999 a year, about ₹66 a day. No seat negotiation, no institution-type banding, no revised quote at renewal. You can put it in a budget before you speak to anyone.