A court publishes lists by bench. A practice runs by matter. This page is about closing that gap before 9 pm rather than at 10:35 am.
An advocate-wise cause list is the same day's listing filtered to the matters in which you are on record. Instead of opening a separate list for every court and bench, you see one list: your matters, their item numbers, and the bench each is before.
A working practice is rarely confined to one forum. A writ before the High Court, two suits in different district courts, a company petition before a tribunal — that is four sets of lists to open every evening, in four different places, in four different shapes. Nobody does that reliably for three hundred working days a year. What people actually do is check the one they are worried about and hope about the rest.
The item number is what decides your morning. Item 4 means you leave chambers at nine. Item 84 means you have until noon and can take a conference first. That single number, published the night before, is the most operationally useful figure in an advocate's day, and it is buried inside a document organised around somebody else's convenience.
A missed listing is the most expensive ten minutes in a chamber. The matter is called, nobody appears, and what follows — dismissal for non-prosecution, an adverse order, a restoration application, an explanation to a client who read about it before you told them — costs vastly more than the evening it would have taken to check. Most missed listings are not carelessness. They are a matter that was added to a supplementary list at eleven at night, in the one court you had already checked.
Everything here is described from where you sit — what you put in, and what you get back.
Add each matter with its CNR, or with its case number, year and court. That identifier is the thread everything else hangs from — it does not change when a bench is reconstituted or a case is renumbered.
As each court publishes its daily, supplementary and additional lists, those listings are checked against your matters — across every bench of every court you appear in, including the ones you were not worried about.
Your matters only, each with the court, the bench, the court number and the item number, ordered so the earliest item sits at the top. A High Court writ and a district court suit appear as two rows on one page rather than two separate evenings of checking.
The list lives in the app, and a reminder can go to WhatsApp so a clerk or a junior sees the same listing without logging in anywhere. A late supplementary addition arrives as a fresh alert, not a silent change to a page you already closed.
Each route answers a slightly different question, and each one fails differently. Knowing which is which is most of the skill.
| Route | What it gets you | Where it lets you down |
|---|---|---|
| Advocate name | Everything listed against your name in that court on that day. | Depends entirely on how the name was typed. Initials, expanded middle names and transliterations all read as different advocates. |
| Bar registration number | A cleaner handle than a name where it is recorded — one advocate, one number. | It is not carried consistently in every listing, so it narrows well but does not guarantee completeness on its own. |
| Party name | Useful when you know the client but not the number, and for matters where you are not on record. | Approximate by nature. Common surnames, government departments and abbreviations return long lists with your matter somewhere inside. |
| Case number and year | Exact, for the court in which the matter is numbered. | Numbers change on renumbering and differ between the filing stage and registration, so an old number can go cold. |
| CNR | Exact, permanent, one matter and only that matter. | You have to have it. Getting it the first time is a one-off task — here is how. |
The practical conclusion is that name-based search alone is not enough to sleep on. It is the right way to look something up quickly. It is the wrong thing to depend on for a matter where an adverse order can follow non-appearance, because the failure mode is silence — no row returned looks exactly like nothing listed.
A consolidated list is only worth having if it reaches every forum a practice actually touches.
Every High Court in the country, principal seat and additional benches alike, plus the Supreme Court of India. Court-by-court detail sits on the courts pages.
Across 722 districts in 35 states and union territories. For most practices this is where the volume of dates lives, and where a missed listing hurts soonest.
Tribunal boards behave like court boards — a daily list per bench, items in order. They appear on the same page as your court matters, not in a separate habit.
The figures behind the coverage. They are what makes a single morning list possible for a practice that sits in three cities.
Once the sitting starts, the list is history. The display board takes over, roughly 10:30 to 16:30 IST on working days.
The listing is only the start of the day. What the order said and when the matter returns is case tracking, and it feeds your deadlines.
Most listings are acted on by somebody other than the arguing counsel. The clerk arranges the file, the junior reaches the court first, the client is told the night before. So a reminder that only exists inside one person's login is a reminder that has to be forwarded by hand, which is where it gets dropped.
Lawgger sends hearing and listing reminders over WhatsApp, and keeps the full list — bench, court number, item number, stage — in the app where the matter itself lives. The chamber can share a matter with the people working on it, so the same listing shows up for everyone with a reason to see it. That is the whole of the claim: nothing here reads a court board for you over WhatsApp, and nothing here is a substitute for opening the list.
Matters, dates, clerks, juniors and billing sit together in the practice suite. What happened after the hearing sits in case tracking. If you run a chamber on your own, the solo advocate page is the closer fit.
Lawgger is software for advocates. It is not a law firm and gives no legal advice.
Yes, advocate-wise listings exist and are widely used. The limitation is that they depend on how your name was entered on the record in each matter. Lawgger treats an advocate-name search as one route in and your own list of matters as the reliable spine, so a listing is not missed because a clerk typed the name differently.
It very often is. Initials, an expanded middle name, a missing full stop or a regional transliteration all produce a different string, and a name-only search will silently miss those rows. The fix is to anchor each matter to its CNR or case number once. After that the listing is found by identifier, and the spelling of your name stops mattering.
Yes. Lawgger can send hearing and listing reminders over WhatsApp so that you, your clerk and your junior see the same thing without anyone logging in. The full consolidated list, with item numbers and bench details, stays in the app. The WhatsApp message is a nudge, not a substitute for reading the list.
Yes. Coverage runs across the Supreme Court, all 25 High Courts, NCLT, NCLAT and CAT, and around 700 district courts spread over 722 districts in 35 states and union territories. For most practices the district court listings matter more than the High Court ones, because that is where the volume of dates sits.
Advocate-name listings generally follow the advocate on record, so a junior, an arguing counsel briefed for the day or a co-counsel may not appear under their own name at all. Adding the matter to your own list solves this: you watch the matter, regardless of whose name the court office has recorded against it.
Yes. NCLT, NCLAT and CAT publish their own listings, and they behave much like High Court lists — a daily board per bench, with items in order. Lawgger carries them alongside the courts, so an insolvency practice and a writ practice appear on the same morning page rather than in two habits.
As soon as the lists exist. Most daily lists are published the previous evening, so your consolidated list is usually ready the night before. Supplementary and additional lists arrive later, so a second alert can follow overnight or early in the morning. Publication hours vary by court, and we do not promise a fixed minute.
Fourteen days free, no card required. Rs 1,999 a month or Rs 19,999 a year afterwards, with GST invoices and cancellation whenever you like.